The Martindale-Hubbell AV Rating for Gerald J. McMahon indicates
very high to pre-eminent legal ability and very high ethical standards
as established by confidential opinions from members of the Bar.
Lawyer Rating Information
reflect the confidential opinions of bar members and the judiciary,
and attest to the individual lawyer's legal ability and adherence
to professional standards of ethics.
to the Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory, ratings are accepted as
exceptionally valuable benchmarks by members of the legal community,
and testify to the unique and respected position the Law Directory
occupies in the legal profession. They are intended for the use
of lawyers and law firms community, and testify to the unique and
respected position the Law Directory occupies in the legal profession.
They are intended
for the use of lawyers and law firms in the practice of their profession.
The public at large is encouraged to consult http://www.lawyers.com,
a site specially designed to meet the legal information needs of
solicits confidential opinions from members of the Bar, including
those who have ratings and those who do not. In addition, members
of the Judiciary are queried. Opinions are solicited via written
questionnaires and by Martindale-Hubbell representatives who conduct
fall into two categories: Legal Ability and General-Ethical Standards.
Unless a rating is established in both categories, no rating is
Legal Ability Ratings (C, B, A) take into consideration the standard
of ability for the area where the lawyer practices, the attorney's
expertise, nature of practice and qualifications relevant to the
profession. Where a lawyer's practice is limited or specialized,
rating opinions are made on the basis of performance in those specific
fields of law.
General-Ethical Standards Rating (V) covers adherence to professional
standards of conduct and ethics, reliability, diligence and other
criteria relevant to the discharge of professional responsibilities.
the United States, 43% of the active bar is rated. Omission of individual
lawyer ratings should not be construed as unfavorable since Martindale-Hubbell
does not undertake to develop ratings for every lawyer. In addition,
certain lawyers have requested their ratings not be published. In
other instances, definitive information required to establish a
rating has yet to be developed.
Gerald J. McMahon